Cases 1 - 10 of 57
BROWNING v. USA
as 1:2020cv00210
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JAMES HOLMAN BROWNING, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Holman v. Fries et al
as 1:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
James Holman
Defendant:
Kenneth C Fries, Carla Jackson and Jennifer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melissa Webster v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 14-60202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELISSA ELAINE WEBSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMMITT SPARKMAN, Deputy Commissioner, JAMES HOLMAN, Superintendent and others
James Curry, Jr. v. Mississippi Dept of Corr, et al
as 13-60790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CURRY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, State of Mississippi, LEE COUNTY CIRCUIT, MONROE COUNTY CIRCUIT and others
Wilson v. Holman
as 3:2013cv00663
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilson
Defendant:
James Holman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Delmar Shelby v. Andera Dupree, et al
as 13-60748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELMAR EARL SHELBY
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDERA DUPREE, Lieutenant, JAMES HOLMAN and SHARON PAGE
Willie Gaines v. Dorris McDonald, et al
as 13-60650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE GAINES
Defendant - Appellee:
DORRIS MCDONALD and JAMES HOLMAN
Darnell Wilson v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner, et al
as 13-60574
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES HOLMAN, Warden at Central Mississippi Correctional Facility, MARGARETT BINGHAM, Superintendent at Central Mississippi Correctional Facility and others
Caison v. Epps et al
as 5:2013cv00108
Plaintiff:
William Caison
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Raymond Byrd, James Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooghe v. Winkel et al
as 3:2013cv00336
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Hooghe
Defendant:
Eydie Winkel, James Holman, Palma Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.