Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Chelesy Eastep v. City of Nashville, TN, et al
as 24-5319
Plaintiff:
CHELESY EASTEP, as surviving spouse and next of kin of Landon Dwayne Eastep
Defendant:
CITY OF NASHVILLE, TN, BRIAN MURPHY, in his individual and official capacity as an officer of the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department, STEVEN CARRICK, in their individual and official capacity as an officer of the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department and others
Eastep v. City of Nashville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00721
Plaintiff:
Chelesy Eastep
Defendant:
City of Nashville, Tennessee, Brian Murphy, Steven Carrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KIDD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06706
Plaintiff:
JAMES KIDD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KIDD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44990
Plaintiff:
JAMES KIDD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayfield v. Kidd et al
as 5:2020cv01246
Plaintiff:
Frankie Tiana Mayfield
Defendant:
Shawn James Kidd and Ace Air Conditioning Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIDD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38180
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES KIDD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIDD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv01740
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES KIDD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kidd v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv03254
Petitioner:
James Kidd
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv50388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv50436
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
