Cases 1 - 9 of 9
James Lackey v. Jason Clendenion
as 22-5243
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES LACKEY
Respondent / Appellee:
JASON CLENDENION, Warden, Turney Center Industrial Complex
Lackey v. Perry, Warden
as 2:2019cv00096
Petitioner:
James Lackey
Respondent:
Grady Perry, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oliver et al v. Lampert et al
as 2:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Oliver and James Lackey
Defendant:
Robert O Lampert, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Eddie Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lackey v. USA
as 3:2016cv00892
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Lackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Powers v. Hagel et al
as 1:2013cv00421
Plaintiff:
Sharon Powers
Defendant:
Chuck Hagel, John McHugh, Dennis L. Via and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Lackey v. East Central Regional Hospital et al
as 1:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
James Lackey
Defendant:
East Central Regional Hospital, Rozanna Tross, Michael Vitacco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vukas v. Lackey
as 1:2009cv00536
Plaintiff:
John A. Vukas
Defendant:
James Lackey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lackey et al v. Thermopolis WY et al
as 2:2008cv00065
Plaintiff:
James Lackey, Lisa Lackey, James Lackey and others
Defendant:
Thermopolis WY, Thermopolis Police Department, Brad W Basse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Genesis Insurance Company v. Carpenter et al
as 1:2007cv00184
Plaintiff:
Genesis Insurance Company and Genesis Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dana Carpenter, Michael Dow, Richard Cashdollar and others
Counter Claimant:
Willie J. Huntley, City of Mobile, Michael Dow and others
Counter Defendant:
Genesis Insurance Company and Genesis Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
