Cases 1 - 10 of 48
M & F Litteken Co. v. James Lane Air Conditioning Company, LLC
as 7:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
M & F Litteken Co.
Defendant:
James Lane Air Conditioning Company, LLC dba James Lane Air Conditioning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01540
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10311
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Roman v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv06737
Plaintiff:
Carlton Roman
Defendant:
The City of New York, Catherine Lomuscio, William Pepey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roman v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv06681
Plaintiff:
Carlton Roman
Defendant:
The City of New York, Catherine Lomuscio, Detective William Pepey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
LANE v. PISTROL
as 5:2022cv00189
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JAMES LANE
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTROL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mark Van Vleet v. Mt. Carmel Police Department, et al
as 22-1017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK A. VAN VLEET
Defendant / Appellee:
MT. CARMEL POLICE DEPARTMENT, CASSANDRA GOLDMAN, JAMES LANE and others
LANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36301
Plaintiff:
JAMES LANE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Vleet v. Mt. Carmel Police Dept. et al
as 3:2021cv00222
Defendant:
Ryan Turner, Steven Sawyer, James Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Van Vleet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv08990
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAMES LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
