Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Lee v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
James Lee
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Knight et al v. Ready Mix USA, LLC
as 3:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
James Lee Knight and Caitlin Knight
Defendant:
Ready Mix USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brown, Sr. v. Lee
as 1:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
James D. Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Robert James Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodman v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
James Lee Rodman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Colbert v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Daniel Colbert
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County, Armond Budish, Earl Leiken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Money v. PNC Bank, NA
as 3:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
James Lee Money
Defendant:
PNC Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Clark v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv10759
Plaintiff:
James Lee Clark, III and Tebtu Shekem
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, 50th District Court, Michael C Martinez and others
Knight et al v. Ready Mix USA, Inc
as 3:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
James Lee Knight and Caitlin Knight
Defendant:
Ready Mix USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McClain v. Vantell
as 1:2022cv01156
Petitioner:
James Lee McClain
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Memphis Union Mission et al
as 2:2022cv02402
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Anderson
Defendant:
Memphis Union Mission, D. Scott Bjork, Terry W. Brimhall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
