Cases 1 - 10 of 22
MALARIK et al v. BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv00780
Defendant:
IZZAT-AL DOUN-BAUTH PARTY OF IRAQ, ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH DIOCEASE OF PITTSBURGH, CHRIS ISLAM OF NIGERIA and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYONS, Sr., ERNEST POOH THORTON and JAMES M. WHITEY BULGER MAFIA MALARIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brown v. Marshall
as 5:2019cv00037
Defendant:
James Marshall
Plaintiff:
Jerra Quantuay Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall #322545 v. Rewerts
as 1:2018cv00778
Petitioner:
Melvin James Marshall #322545
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marshall v. United States of America
as 8:2015cv01781
Plaintiff:
Ernest James Marshall
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James Marshall v. George Crutchfield
as 14-3021
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES MARSHALL
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE CRUTCHFIELD, Warden
Harry Marshall v. Secretary, Department of Corr, et al
as 13-14292
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARRY JAMES MARSHALL
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Marshall v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 6:2013cv01012
Petitioner:
Harry James Marshall
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Marshall v. Michael Harlow, et al
as 12-3778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
MARSHALL v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2012cv00946
Petitioner:
JAMES MARSHALL
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA L. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harry Marshall v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 11-14816
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARRY JAMES MARSHALL
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
