Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Mathieu v. Texas Department of Public Safety and Contractors
as 4:2026cv04661
Plaintiff:
James Mathieu
Defendant:
Texas Department of Public Safety and Contractors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MATHIEU v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CONTRACTORS
as 1:2026cv01297
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATHIEU
Defendant:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CONTRACTORS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MATHIEU v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CONTRACTORS
as 1:2026cv00460
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATHIEU
Defendant:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CONTRACTORS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATHIEU v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CONTRACTORS
as 1:2025cv04601
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATHIEU
Defendant:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CONTRACTORS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathieu v. Cazi et al
as 1:2023cv08663
Plaintiff:
James Mathieu
Defendant:
Tamara Cazi and County of Queens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Mathieu et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv20074
Plaintiff:
James Mathieu and Patricia Mathieu
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathieu v. City of Cincinnati Police Impound
as 1:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
James Mathieu
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati Police Impound
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Mathieu v. Robertson
as 6:2021cv00287
Plaintiff:
James Mathieu
Defendant:
Colton Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathieu v. Robertson
as 3:2021cv02222
Plaintiff:
James Mathieu
Defendant:
Colton Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathieu v. Babineaux et al
as 3:2021cv02223
Plaintiff:
James Mathieu
Defendant:
R Babineaux, Lauren Cox and Caleb Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
