Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Aaron Pierce v. Jeannette Woodford
as 10-16064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON JAMES PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNETTE WOODFORD
Pierce v. Warden, Ross County Correctional Institution
as 3:2010cv00132
Petitioner:
James Pierce
Respondent:
Warden, Ross County Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aaron Pierce v. Jeannette Woodford
as 10-15634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON JAMES PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNETTE WOODFORD
Aaron Pierce v. Jeannie Woodford, et al
as 09-17015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON JAMES PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNIE S. WOODFORD, M.D. SINNA, CTF/ Soledad Doctor, M.D. ROBERTSON and others
Aaron Pierce v. Edward Alameida, Jr., et al
as 09-16868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON JAMES PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., SCOTT KERNAN, Mule Creek State Prison Warden, DAVID RUNNELS, High Desert State Prison Warden and others
Aaron Pierce v. Edward Alameida, Jr., et al
as 09-16714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON JAMES PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., SCOTT KERNAN, Mule Creek State Prison Warden, DAVID RUNNELS, High Desert State Prison Warden and others
Pierce v. Woodford
as 5:2009cv03343
Plaintiff:
Aaron James Pierce
Defendant:
Jeanette Woodford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Cook v. Boyd Bennett
as 09-7104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER EUGENE COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons, JAMES PIERCE, Assistant Superintendant of Programs and DENE PITTS, Assistant Superintendant of Programs
Rinehart v. Beck et al
as 5:2009ct03019
Plaintiff:
Jean-Claude Rinehart
Defendant:
Theodis Beck, Boyd Bennett, James Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PARKER v. CHAVIS et al
as 1:2008cv00416
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RAY PARKER
Defendant:
PATRICIA L. CHAVIS and JAMES PIERCE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
