Cases 1 - 8 of 8
COOK v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv06823
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. COOK
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson, Raymond et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as WIW/3:16-cv-00241
Plaintiff:
Raymond M. Anderson , Andrew Maple Grove Farms, Inc. , Anfang Farms, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG , Syngenta Crop Protection AG , Syngenta Corporation and others
Anderson, Raymond et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2016cv00241
Plaintiff:
Raymond M. Anderson , Andrew Maple Grove Farms, Inc. , Anfang Farms, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NCN Lending, LLC v. Cook et al DO NOT DOCKET - CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT
as 2:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
NCN Lending, LLC
Defendant:
James T Cook and Judith B Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NCN Lending, LLC v. Cook et al
as 4:2010cv00483
Plaintiff:
NCN Lending, LLC
Defendant:
James T Cook and Judith B Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
We People Fdn Inc, et al v. USA, et al
as 05-5359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
We The People Foundation, Inc., We The People Congress, Inc., Robert L. Schulz and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and others
Terminated Party:
Constitutional Defender Association and John Wolfgram, President of the Constitutional Defender Association
James T. Cook v. American Standard, et al.
as VAE/2:03-CV-07315
Plaintiff:
James T. Cook
Defendant:
American Standard
HOWARD V US
as 03-1338
Plaintiff-Appellant:
ALFRED WOLFE, BYRON HOWARD, CHARLES D. REVIE and others
Defendant-Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense, UNITED STATES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
