Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Neal v. Vaughan
as 5:2022ct03222
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal
Defendant:
Warden James Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Credle v. Roy Cooper
as 21-7675
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM D. CREDLE
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY COOPER, ERIK A. HOOKS, TODD E. ISHEE and others
Credle v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021ct03162
Defendant:
Paula Smith, Todd Ishee, Nurse Hux and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Credle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galeas v. Swain et al
as 5:2021ct03057
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas, Jr. and Jorge Gevara
Defendant:
Captain Perry, Larry K. Swain, Mike Causey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Jones v. Jeffrey Rickman
as 20-7504
Defendant / Appellee:
BELINDA E. ABREU-PENA, Dentist at Alexander C.I., in her individual and official capacites, KENNETH LASSITER, Director of Adult Corrections Prisons Division, in his individual and official capacites, ERIC HOOKS, Secretary of the D.P.S., in his individual and official capacites and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY HUDSON JONES
Defendant:
JAMES VAUGHAN
VAUGHAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv93543
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES VAUGHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hairston v. Vaughan et al
as 5:2020ct03251
Defendant:
William Mouring and James Vaughan
Plaintiff:
Berkley Eugene Hairston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughan (ID 43021) v. Miller
as 5:2020cv03010
Petitioner:
James Vaughan
Respondent:
Christine Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lyles v. Tillery, et al
as 5:2019cv00459
Plaintiff:
Hildred Manuel Lyles, Jr.
Defendant:
Erik Hooks, Danny Safrit, Katy Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CROSSEY v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION PENSION PLAN et al
as 2:2019cv01468
Defendant:
TODD MILLER, STEVE NICKOL, MELVA VOGLER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CROSSEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
