Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Gallagher v. Derkovicz et al
as 1:2013cv00804
Plaintiff:
Joseph Irving Gallagher
Defendant:
Gregory J. Derkovicz, James Walsh and Wendy L. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dekom v. New York
as 13-2773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin Dekom, Kenneth Jacoby and Robert Pendleton
Defendant - Appellee:
New York, Andrew Cuomo, Governor, Eric T. Schneiderman and others
Roland III v. McMayle et al
as 1:2012cv06331
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Roland III
Defendant:
McMayle, Taft, Saul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodell v. Walsh
as 12-2663
Petitioner:
Nathan Dodell, AKA Allah Kasiem
Respondent:
James Walsh, Superintendent
Pepe v. Walsh
as 12-2530
Petitioner - Appellant:
Vincent Pepe
Respondent - Appellee:
James Walsh, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility
Myrick v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02411
Defendant:
City of New York, Prabhjot Sekhon and James Walsh
The Names John And Jane Doe Being Fictitious, As The True Names Are Presently Unknown:
John Doe and Jane Doe #1-13
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Myrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dekom v. New York
as 12-1446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin Dekom, Kenneth Jacoby and Robert Pendleton
Defendant - Appellee:
New York, Andrew Cuomo, Governor, Eric T. Schneiderman and others
Dekom et al v. New York et al
as 2:2012cv01318
Defendant:
Evelyn Aquila, William Biamonte, Andrew Cuomo and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Dekom, Kenneth Jacoby and Robert Pendleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv09376
Plaintiff:
Lavaghn Davis
Defendant:
The City of New York , Thomas Alcamo, Patrick Cortwright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon v. Fischer et al
as 1:2011cv05670
Plaintiff:
Jesse Shannon
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Norman Bezio, James Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
