Cases 11 - 20 of 79
James Washington v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 17-2878
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Washington v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01589
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Larry James Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy Washington v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-10231
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY JAMES WASHINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Washington v. USA
as 3:2016cv02190
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lionel James Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Washington v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00719
Plaintiff:
James Washington
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv02046
Petitioner:
Timothy James Washington
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. Biter et al
as 1:2014cv01411
Plaintiff:
James Washington
Defendant:
M. Biter, Anthony Swanson, A. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Sherman
as 2:2014cv01618
Petitioner:
James Washington
Respondent:
Stu Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. USA
as 3:2014cv02284
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lionel James Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilson v. Ruff et al
as 4:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
Ruby Wilson
Defendant:
Michael Ruff , Travis Lupton , April Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
