Cases 51 - 60 of 276
Bryant v. Fletcher
as 1:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jeanne B. Bryant
Defendant:
James William Fletcher, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Williams v. Roos et al
as 2:2018cv00046
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Roos, Bishop, Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rifley v. Municipality of Anchorage Police Department et al
as 3:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Tyler Fredrick Rifley
Defendant:
Municipality of Anchorage Police Department and James Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. County of Clark
as 2:2017cv02952
Respondent:
County of Clark
Petitioner:
James Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04234
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ann Graham and James William Graham, Jr.
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gates v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv02787
Petitioner:
James William Gates
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams et al v. Northern Suncrest Apartments LLC et al
as 5:2017cv03512
Plaintiff:
James Williams and Project Sentinel
Defendant:
Northern Suncrest Apartments LLC , James Wu , Joe Tai-Chang Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Erickson et al v. Aurora Loan Services LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
James William Erickson and Lana Kim Vierra
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services LLC , Aurora Commercial Corporation and Doe Defendants 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2017cv01355
Respondent:
County of Clark and Joe Lombardo
Petitioner:
James Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2017cv01155
Respondent:
County of Clark and Joe Lombardo
Petitioner:
James Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
