Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Hicks v. Catton et al
as 4:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Christian Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Michael Lee Catton, Nicholas Raymond Mark, Nicholas J. Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooksey v. Stacy et al
as 4:2023cv04070
Plaintiff:
Timothy Curtis Cooksey
Defendant:
Jailer Ragan Stacy, Jail Administrator Rami Cox, James Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Catton et al
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Christian Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Officer Michael Lee Catton, Officer Nicholas Raymond Mark, Officer Nicholas J Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Langdeaux v. State of Iowa, et al
as 22-2478
Plaintiff:
Trey Redowl, Lawrence Tyndall, Lamonte Bertucci and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James William Langdeaux
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Iowa, Judy Morrison, Contractual Stae Employee, Iowa Department of Corrections and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Jane Does 1-10
Chvala v. Yankton FPC Warden
as 4:2021cv04092
Petitioner:
James William Chvala
Respondent:
Yankton FPC Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dillon v. Reilly et al
as 4:2019cv03119
Defendant:
Tom Llewellyn, Michael A. Reilly, James Gaddy and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Dillon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Bartruff
as 1:2017cv00111
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Jerry Bartruff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Bartruff
as 6:2017cv02037
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Jerry Bartruff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Bartruff
as 4:2017cv00229
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Jerry Bartruff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel v. Williams et al
as 1:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
MeShaw Daniel
Defendant:
James Williams, Keith Bickford and Anthony Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
