Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Burton et al v. Winn et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Logan Burton, Marc Zdrojewski, James Wright and others
Defendant:
Cody Clay Winn, Market Modern, LLC and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wright v. UPG Roadside & Towing, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02829
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Defendant:
UPG Roadside & Towing, Inc.
Boussum et al v. Washington et al
as 1:2022cv12232
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Boussum, Phillip Berryman, James Wright and others
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush, Russ Marian and others
Wright v. ADT, LLC
as 1:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Defendant:
American Huts, Inc. and ADT Pizza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wright et al v. Ryan et al
as 5:2019cv00153
Defendant:
Joseph K. Ryan and Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
James Wright and David Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Walkway Restoration Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02537
Defendant:
Michael D. Zatelli and Walkway Restoration Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sanderson v. Wright et al
as 2:2018cv12534
Plaintiff:
Gina Sanderson
Defendant:
Philip James Wright and Darling Ingredients, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
Troy Lewis
Defendant:
Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government , Louisville Metro Department of Corrections , Allan Fugate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wright v. Reliable Landscaping, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv14321
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Defendant:
Reliable Landscaping, Inc. and Thomas Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. Durrani et al
as 1:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
Cory Wright , Julie Wright and James Wright
Defendant:
Children's Hospital Medical Center and Abubakar Atiq Durrani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
