Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Overton v. Winston County Jail et al
as 6:2010cv01596
Plaintiff:
Kristie Louann Overton
Defendant:
Winston County Jail, Ed Townsand, James Wright and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Overton v. Winston County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00415
Plaintiff:
Kristie Louann Overton
Defendant:
Winston County Jail, Ed Townsand, James Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Hamlet
as 2:2009cv02543
Petitioner:
Gordon James Wright
Respondent:
J Hamlet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. State of Idaho, et al
as 09-4155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA LYDELL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, GOVERNOR STATE OF IDAHO, ATTORNEY FOR GOVERNOR STATE OF IDAHO and others
Martin v. County of Winston, Alabama et al
as 4:2009cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jack Lydell Martin
Defendant:
County of Winston, Alabama, Ed Townsend, James Wright and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wright v. Bates et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00965
Plaintiff:
Willie James Wright
Defendant:
Dr. Bates, Nurse Stricklen and Nurse Bailey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Townsend et al
as 6:2008cv01287
Plaintiff:
Phillip Delane Martin
Defendant:
Ed Townsend, Winston County Jail, James Wright and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. State of Idaho et al
as 2:2008cv00445
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Governor, State of Idaho, Attorney for Governor, State of Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WRIGHT v MCNEIL
as 5:2008cv00180
Petitioner:
ROBERT JAMES WRIGHT
Respondent:
WALTER MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Warren et al
as 2:2008cv11787
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Defendant:
Michael Warren and David Gorcyca
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
