Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Smith v. Quezada
as 4:2022cv02114
Plaintiff:
Jamil Smith
Defendant:
Judge Yahaira Quezada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Graves Harrington et al
as 4:2022cv01289
Plaintiff:
Jamil Smith
Defendant:
Judge Angela Graves Harrington, Judge Yahaira Quezada and CPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
JONES et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. JONES and JAMIL SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOCAL 159 AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 33, DAVID ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacinto Alvarez, et al v. Christoher LaRose, et al
as 20-55795
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE RIDLEY, LEOPOLDO SZURGOT, MARLENE CANO and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN C. STAFFORD, United States Marshal for the Southern District of California, CHRISTOHER J. LAROSE, Senior Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center and DONALD W. WASHINGTON, Director of the United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00782
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Damian Smith v. USA
as 17-13465
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAMIAN JAMIL SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. United State of America
as 6:2015cv00951
Petitioner:
Damian Jamil Smith
Respondent:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SMITH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
JAMIL SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, R. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2013cv02780
Plaintiff:
JAMIL SMITH
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHELLE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
