Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lightfoot v. Oak Bend Med Ctr
as 26-20056
Plaintiff:
Jan Elizabeth Lightfoot, Ph. D., Doctor, also known as Jan Christopher, also known as Janice Marie Banks
Defendant:
Oak Bend Medical Center, Courtney Landry, Doctor, Registered Nurse Cathy Landry and others
Lightfoot v. Oak Bend Med Ctr
as 25-20178
Defendant:
Oak Bend Medical Center, Courtney Landry, Doctor, Registered Nurse Cathy Landry and others
Plaintiff:
Jan Elizabeth Lightfoot, Ph. D., Doctor, also known as Jan Christopher, also known as Janice Marie Banks
Lightfoot v. Oak Bend Medical Center et al
as 4:2025cv00837
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jan Elizabeth Lightfoot, Jan Christopher and Janice Marie Banks
Defendant:
Oak Bend Medical Center, Dr. Courtney Landry, RN Cathy Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hvide v. Holdun Family Office, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv20884
Plaintiff:
Leif-Erik Hvide
Defendant:
HOLDUN FAMILY OFFICE, LLC, HOLT FINANCIAL, LTD., HOLDUN FAMILY OFFICE (BAHAMAS) LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Joseph Harvey v. USA, et al
as 20-12528
Defendant / Appellee:
JAN CHRISTOPHER SMITH, II, THOMAS WATTS-FITZGERALD, LEONARDO SPITOLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH HARVEY
Hvide v. Holt Financial LTD et al
as 1:2020cv22266
Defendant:
Gordon Dempsey, Holdun Family Office (Bahamas) Limited, Brendan Holt Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Leif Erik Hvide and Leif-Erik Hvide
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. USA
as 3:2007cv05069
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jan Christopher Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
