Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Whitener v. The Rutherford County Detention Center et al
as 1:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Chris Francis, Jane Doe 1, RCDC's Healthcare Provider and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Dale Whitener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe-4 v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services et al
as 1:2021cv00355
Defendant:
George Willie Yeldell, Jerry B. Adger, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brown v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv02006
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Timothy Jackson, John/Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Janoblin Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNCAN v. SCHATZMAN et al
as 1:2019cv00353
Defendant:
K. ADAMS, SABEL CALDWELL, WENDY HOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TORREY DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Stirling et al
as 5:2019cv00938
Defendant:
Jane Doe 10, Charles Williams, Thiery Nettles and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Waters et al
as 2:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Waters
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Incorporated, Ed Wright, Daniel Calhoun, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tiarra Fain v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 13-7177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIARRA FAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY, SUPERINTENDENT JOSEPH HIGGS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MELISSA STONE and others
Fain v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 3:2012cv00293
Plaintiff:
Tiarra Fain
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Joseph Higgs, Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Meletis et al
as 3:2009cv00538
Plaintiff:
Robert Benjamin Stout
Defendant:
Meletis, Amanda Lambert, Jerrold Negin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
