Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Darrell Woods v. Wesley Fluharty, et al
as 23-1340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell Woods
Defendant / Appellee:
Wesley Fluharty, John and Jane Doe 1, John and Jane Doe 2 and others
Jeude v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Todd Jeude
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Adrian Barnes, Doctor Unknown Mallard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strickland v. Corizon, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2022cv06009
Plaintiff:
Kevin Strickland
Defendant:
Corizon, L.L.C., Dr. Thomas Bredeman, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Fuwell et al
as 1:2021cv00103
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Taylor Fuwell, Heather Tidwell, Heather Annesser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Keen et al
as 4:2021cv00534
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo J. Williams
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, John Doe 3, Daniel Keen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Jackson County, Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv00230
Defendant:
Jackson County, Missouri, John Doe #1, Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Brian T Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Alcazar et al
as 0:2019cv03095
Defendant:
DHO Stolarzwk, C.O. Anderson, Ms Balas and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin P. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Corizon LLC et al
as 5:2019cv06146
Defendant:
Jane Doe 3, Tammie Christopher, Kelly Crisman and others
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin Grace Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurlbut v. Clark et al
as 6:2019cv06106
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, Warden Faust, Investigator Thomas Rowland and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Hurlbut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxfield v. City of Kansas City et al
as 4:2018cv00896
Defendant:
Unknown Open Facility, Jane Doe 1, Unknown Building and others
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Gary Maxfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
