Cases 1 - 8 of 8
John Doe #1, et al v. William Lee, et al
as 23-5248
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM BYRON LEE, Governor of the State of Tennessee, in his official capacity and DAVID B. RAUSCH, Director of the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company v. Natural Remedies Massage, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03578
Plaintiff:
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Natural Remedies Massage, LLC, Broad St Property LLC, Matthew Schaitel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Doe v. Eastern Michigan University Board of Regents et al
as 2:2021cv10649
Defendant:
Delta Tau Delta Theta XI Chapter, Eastern Michigan University Board of Regents, Alpha Sigma Phi Fraternity, INC and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 8 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
John and Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Springboro Community City School District et al
as 1:2019cv00785
Plaintiff:
John Doe 1-12, John and Jane Doe 4, John and Jane Doe 7 and others
Defendant:
John Austin Hopkins, Carrie Corder, Daniel Schroer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe 1 et al v. Perry et al
as 3:2019cv00142
Defendant:
Deputy D, Deputy C, Lois Cannon and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 8, Jane Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv12120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Broom v. Kasich et al
as 2:2009cv00823
Plaintiff:
Romell Broom and Romell Broom
Defendant:
Ted Strickland, Terry Collins, Phil Kerns and others
Movant:
Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Bill Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
