Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Burks et al v. Skyline Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv07084
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Burks, Tanisha Burks, Tanisha Burks and others
Defendant:
Skyline Corporation, Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv85239
Plaintiff:
JANET DAVIS, JANET DAVIS, REECE HENRY DAVIS and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Oscar Dantzler, Jr. v. Kathy Montecino, et al
as 09-30772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSCAR DANTZLER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHY MONTECINO, Individually and in her capacity as City Councilmen, NICKY MUSCARELLO, Individually and in his capacity as City Councilmen, CURTIS WILSON, Individually and in his capacity as City Councilmen and others
FLICK v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2008cv00461
Plaintiff:
NORMAN FLICK
Defendant:
HECTOR MANUEL GONZALES, RICHARD N. BOE, MICHAEL S. SHERFICK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MV Transportation, Inc. v. MV Public Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv05712
Plaintiff:
MV Transportation, Inc., MV Transportation, Inc., MV Transportation, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Janet Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Davis v. The Tower Group, Inc.
as 8:2007cv01588
Plaintiff:
Janet Davis
Defendant:
The Tower Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-30310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
