Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. United States Of America
as 1:2023cv23667
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jason Bryant
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ezell v. Hininger, et al
as 23-7007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMON HININGER, CEO of Core Civic, JAMES YATES, Warden, Davis Correctional Facility, DEPUTY WARDEN GENTRY and others
Bryant v. White
as 1:2022cv04812
Petitioner:
Jason Bryant
Respondent:
Jermaine White and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ezell v. Hininger, et al
as 22-7024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMON HININGER, CEO of Core Civic, JAMES YATES, Warden, Davis Correctional Facility, DEPUTY WARDEN GENTRY and others
Davis v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Amber Martin, Mark Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Wellpath Inc, FNU Smith, Rita Hood and others
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claudio v. Bates et al
as 5:2021cv00071
Defendant:
J Kevin Stitt, Mark Knutson, FNU Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anibal Claudio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claudio v. Bates et al
as 5:2020cv01216
Defendant:
J Kevin Stitt, Mark Knutson, FNU Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anibal Claudio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ezell v. Hininger et al
as 6:2019cv00302
Plaintiff:
James Ezell, James R. Ezell and James Ezell, III
Defendant:
David Cincotta, Gentry, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
