Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilburn v. Danville City of et al
as 3:2026cv00116
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tyrell Wilburn and Anthony T Wilburn
Defendant:
Danville City of, N Hawk, Evan Love and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCOY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27100
Plaintiff:
JASON MCCOY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCOY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20266
Plaintiff:
JASON MCCOY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M Occupational Safety LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company v. Russo et al
as 3:2021cv03208
Counter Defendant:
Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
Cross Defendant:
Angelo N. Russo, Sr.
Cross Claimant:
Jason McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Southard v. McCoy et al
as 2:2021mc00038
Plaintiff:
Sean C. Southard
Defendant:
Jason McCoy and Kenneth McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Southard v. McCoy et al
as 2:2021mc00037
Plaintiff:
Sean C. Southard
Defendant:
Jason McCoy and Kenneth McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Harris et al v. National Waterproofing & Roofing LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01537
Plaintiff:
Darwin Harris, Jessie Blackwell and Jason McCoy
Defendant:
National Waterproofing & Roofing LLC and Kirk Poteet
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MCCOY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv29796
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00520
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
