Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Schaefer v. Warden, Coleman USP
as 6:2024cv00324
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Respondent:
Warden, Coleman USP and Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Schaefer v. Warden, Coleman USP
as 5:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
White v. USA
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Jason Paul White
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
NEIL v. TATE et al.
as 3:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
JASON PAUL NEIL
Defendant:
WARDEN ABBY TATE, DEPUTY WARDEN EDMUNDSON, LIEUTENANT FOGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
Alcaliph Woodard
Defendant:
Domingo Gonzales, Terrance Davis, Chris Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schaefer v. USA
as 3:2023cv00948
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Woodard v. Paul et al
as 1:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Alcaliph Woodard
Defendant:
Jason Paul, Justin Cooper, Michael L Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Steinbrink v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-11224
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON PAUL STEINBRINK
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
USA v. Jason Schaefer
as 22-35846
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON PAUL SCHAEFER
Schaefer v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2022cv00440
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
