Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. Tisdale
as 23-50637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Alonzo Jones, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Roderick Tisdale, Officer, Jason Petty, Officer and Michael May, U.S. Marshal
Jones, Jr v. Tisdale et al
as 6:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Frank Alonzo Jones, JR
Defendant:
Roderick Tisdale, Jason Petty and Michael May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Jr v. Tisdale et al
as 4:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Frank Alonzo Jones, JR
Defendant:
Roderick Tisdale, Jason Petty and Michael May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETTIS v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv05121
Plaintiff:
JASON PETTIS
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY and MIDDLESEX WATER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETTY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv56450
Plaintiff:
JASON PETTY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETTY v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv00025
Defendant:
ERIC TICE, TED JOHNSON and JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
JASON PETTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PETTIS v. BONDS et al
as 3:2018cv11626
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Petitioner:
JASON PETTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davidson et al v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2018mc00033
Petitioner:
Thomas Davidson , Todd Cleary , Eric Siegal and others
Respondent:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Marvin Guy v. City of Killeen, Texas, et al
as 16-51433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN L. GUY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF KILLEEN, TEXAS, Texas Civil Service Commission, CHIEF DENNIS BALDWIN, Individual and Official Capacity, JONATHAN R. RINEHART, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00570
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
