Cases
PALMER, JR. v. INFOSYS LIMITED et al
as 6:2014cv00905
Plaintiff: JACK "JAY" PALMER, JR.
Defendant: Infosys Limited , NARAYANA MURTHY, JEFFREY FRIEDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Hpev, Inc. v. Spirit Bear Limited et al
as 1:2014cv09175
Plaintiff: Hpev, Inc.
Defendant: Spirit Bear Limited, Jay Palmer and Robert A. Olins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
PALMER, JR. v. INFOSYS LIMITED et al
as 3:2014cv06122
Plaintiff: JACK "JAY" PALMER, JR.
Defendant: INFOSYS LIMITED, NARAYANA MURTHY, JEFFREY FRIEDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
HPEV, Inc. v. Spirit Bear Limited et al
as 1:2014cv05619
Plaintiff: Hpev, Inc.
Defendant: Robert A. Olins, Jay Palmer and Spirit Bear Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
HPEV, INC. v. SPIRIT BEAR LIMITED et al
as 2:2014cv05619
Plaintiff: HPEV, INC.
Defendant: Robert A. Olins, JAY PALMER and SPIRIT BEAR LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
HPEV, Inc. v. Spirit Beal Limited et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01548
Defendant: Carrie Ann Dwyer, Donica Holt, Jay Palmer and others
Plaintiff: HPEV, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Palmer v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00025
Plaintiff: Billy Jay Palmer
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Madoff v. Barron's dba Barron's.com a/k/a www.Barrons.com, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00048
Plaintiff: Bernard Madoff doing business as Jonathan Lee Riches also known as Arthur Nadel and Arthur Nadel
Defendant: Barron's doing business as Barron's.com also known as www.Barrons.com, Ward S McGuiness, Diane Sipprelle and others
Respondent: Warden Stephen Dewalt
Petitioner: Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?