Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Rodney Pierce v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1095
Plaintiff:
RODNEY D. PIERCE and MOSES MATTHEWS
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALAN HIRSCH, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
ROY A. COOPER, III and JOSHUA STEIN
Rodney Pierce v. The North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 23-2317
Plaintiff:
RODNEY D. PIERCE and MOSES MATTHEWS
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALAN HIRSCH, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
WILLIAMS et al v. HALL et al
as 1:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
SHAUNA WILLIAMS, FLOR HERRERA-PICASSO, MINERVA FREEMAN and others
Defendant:
DESTIN HALL, WARREN DANIEL, RALPH E. HISE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce et al v. The North Carolina State Board of Elections et al
as 4:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Rodney D. Pierce and Moses Matthews
Defendant:
The North Carolina State Board of Elections, Alan Hirsch, Jeff Carmon III and others
Amicus Curiae:
Roy A. Cooper, III and Joshua H Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA et al v. HIRSCH et al
as 1:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA BLACK ALLIANCE and LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
ALAN HIRSCH, JEFF CARMON, III, KEVIN LEWIS and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NORTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY, VIRGINIA A. WASSERBERG and others
Petitioner:
PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juliette Grimmett v. Nancy Freeman
as 22-1844
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIETTE GRIMMETT, RALSTON LAPP GUINN MEDIA GROUP, JOSH STEIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY LORRIN FREEMAN, in her official capacity as District Attorney for the 10th Prosecutorial District of the State of North Carolina
Defendant:
DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, In his official capacity as Member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
DUKE FIRST AMENDMENT CLINIC
GRIMMETT et al v. CIRCOSTA et al
as 1:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
JULIETTE GRIMMETT, RALSTON LAPP GUINN MEDIA GROUP, JOSH STEIN FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL CAMPAIGN and others
Defendant:
DAMON CIRCOSTA, STELLA ANDERSON, JEFF CARMON III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disability Rights NC v. North Carolina Board of Elections et al
as 5:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights NC
Defendant:
North Carolina Board of Elections, Jeff Carmon, III, Karen Brinson Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanner et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021cv00014
Defendant:
Jeff Carmon, III, Stella Anderson, Roy Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Barbour, Lucas Miller and Beth Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Moore v. Democracy North Carolina
as 20-2118
Appellant:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, REGINA WHITNEY EDWARDS, JOHN P. CLARK and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BOBBY HEATH, ALAN SWAIN, MAXINE WHITLEY and others
Defendant:
STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as a member of the Noth Carolina State Board of Elections, KAREN BRINSON BELL, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Intervenor Defendant:
SANDRA MALONE, NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS, BECKY JOHNSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
