Cases 1 - 10 of 719
Wood v. Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wood
Defendant:
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company and Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Wood et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Brona Wood and Jeffrey Wood, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carl Bennett v. MDOC, et al
as 22-1863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL BENNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACKSON ALLEGIANCE HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE, staff involved in surgery and others
Woods v. Spears
as 7:2022cv00503
Plaintiff:
John Jeffrey Woods
Defendant:
Jerry Spears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Dull, et al
as 7:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
John Jeffrey Woods
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail, Frank Dull and Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvin Frazier v. Jeffrey Woods, et al
as 21-2900
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden, BARRY BUTLER, ARUS, DAVID ISARD, Deputy Warden, Classification Committee and others
Macon et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2021cv05530
Plaintiff:
Barbara Bailey, Deneice Campbell, Jayda Chisolm and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Macon et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2021cv01832
Plaintiff:
Keith Moore, Tonya Taylor, Matthew Myers and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Macon et al v. Ford Motor Company
as SC/3:21-CV-01832
Plaintiff:
Macon, Barbara Bailey, Deneice Campbell and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Aaronn Owens v. Connie Horton
as 20-2200
Respondent:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden and CONNIE HORTON, Warden
Petitioner:
AARONN JERMAINE OWENS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
