Cases 1 - 10 of 24
TORAN v. RANDOLPH et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
MILES TORAN
Defendant:
ISSAC RANDOLPH, CARLA COAKLEY, MADISEN GILBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNEIL v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
MICKEL J. MCNEIL
Defendant:
KEVIN GILMORE, YARBER, FISCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEALS v. PURCELL et al
as 2:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
WARREN ALEXANDER BEALS
Defendant:
RANDALL PURCELL, ABIGAIL COOPER, SCOTT FISCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darius Printup v. Indiana Department of Correction, et al
as 23-1292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., FRANK VANIHEL and others
SNOW v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SNOW
Defendant:
MATTHEW BROWN, DANIEL BEDWELL, KEVIN GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNOW v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. SNOW
Defendant:
MATTHEW BROWN, KEVIN GILMORE, RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. IDOC et al
as 2:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
IDOC, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv05148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Alemayehu Jimma v. City of Seattle, et al
as 20-35173
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SEATTLE, STEVEN BALE, #6783 Seattle Police Officer, JENNIFER GARDNER, #7458 Seattle Police Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEMAYEHU JIMMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
