Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Anthony Jermaine Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Leon Johnson v. F. Duty
as 24-6197
Plaintiff:
LEON JERMAINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
F. DUTY, sued in individual capacity, J. R. MASSINGILL, sued in individual capacity, J. R. ADAMS and others
Leon Johnson v. F. Duty
as 24-6193
Plaintiff:
LEON JERMAINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
F. DUTY, J. R. MASSINGILL, J. SHEPHERD, sued in their individual capacities and others
Jermaine Johnson v. USA
as 23-13814
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERMAINE JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rodney Johnson v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 23-2925
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY JERMAINE JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Johnson v. United States Of America
as 0:2023cv61575
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Johnson
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Justin Johnson v. Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
as 23-6753
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN JERMAINE JOHNSON, a/k/a Justin J. Johnson
Respondent:
WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Johnson v. Hughes
as 3:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Johnson
Defendant:
Brian Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2022cv03210
Petitioner:
Justin Jermaine Johnson and Justin J. Johnson
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Freeman et al
as 7:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Leon Jermaine Johnson
Defendant:
A. Freeman, J. Shephard, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
