Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2017cv06892
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerome Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
United States of America v. Felder (Tyrone)
as 17-2503
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kareem Martin, AKA Heavy, AKA Reem, AKA Jamal Walker, Nicomedes Frasqueri, AKA Nick, Fredrick Allen, AKA Fox and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Tyrone Felder, AKA Meme, AKA ManMan
Thomas v. Larkey et al
as 5:2017cv00091
Plaintiff:
Cedric Jerome Thomas
Defendant:
Joshua A. Larkey and John Rumpker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00305
Plaintiff:
Otis Jerome Thomas
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Felder (Martin)
as 17-762
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tyrone Felder, AKA Meme, ManMan, Nicomedes Frasqueri, AKA Nick, Fredrick Allen, AKA Fox and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kareem Martin, AKA Heavy, AKA Reem, AKA Jamal Walker
Eddie Thomas v. USA
as 16-16844
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDDIE JEROME THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Felder (Tyrone)
as 16-3555
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kareem Martin, AKA Heavy, AKA Reem, AKA Jamal Walker, Nicomedes Frasqueri, AKA Nick, Fredrick Allen, AKA Fox and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Tyrone Felder, AKA Meme, AKA ManMan
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv03618
Petitioner:
JEROME THOMAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Jerome Thoma
as 16-2716
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Jerome Thomas
Thomas v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2016cv20647
Plaintiff:
Jerome Thomas
Defendant:
State of Florida and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
