Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jerry Hille v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04398
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hille
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill v. Mendrick et al
as 1:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hill
Defendant:
James Mendrick, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallen v. Consumer Reports, Inc.
as 23-53
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Wallen, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Royce Lader, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Frank Highsmith, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Consumer Reports, Inc.
Hill v. FloSports, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
JERRY HILL
Defendant:
FLOSPORTS and FloSports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hail v. Dixon et al
as 8:2022cv01157
Plaintiff:
M. J. Christian Hail
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, State of Florida, Mark S. Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallen v. Consumer Reports, Inc.
as 7:2021cv08624
Plaintiff:
JAMES WALLEN, Royce Lader, Frank Highsmith and others
Defendant:
Consumer Reports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Haile v. Bryk et al
as 1:2021cv21849
Plaintiff:
John Haile, J. Christian Hail, Sr. and Reverend Doctor MJ
Defendant:
Jerry Hill, J.D. Durrance, James D. Langford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Safeway Inc
as 3:2021cv05170
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hill
Defendant:
Safeway Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hill v. Rivers
as 3:2020cv50472
Respondent:
Warden Rivers
Petitioner:
Jerry Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
