Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Torbert et al v. Advanced Disposal Services Alabama, LLC, et al
as 1:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
Randy Torbert , Kathy Torbert , Jerry Barton and others
Defendant:
Advanced Disposal Services Alabama, LLC and Advanced Disposal Services Mobile Transfer Station, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jerry Butuna v. Mark Nooth
as 13-35178
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY BARTON BUTUNA
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK NOOTH
Butuna v. Nooth
as 2:2011cv01177
Petitioner:
Jerry Barton Butuna
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Tyson et al
as 1:2011cv00301
Plaintiff:
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Defendant:
Gary Tyson, Karaoke Krave, Robert Montague and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Jerry Barton v. A.o. Smith, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-78474
Defendant:
A.o. Smith
Plaintiff:
Jerry Barton
Barton v. Merck & Company Inc
as 2:2008cv01777
Plaintiff:
Jerry Barton, Jerry Barton and Jerry Barton
Defendant:
Merck & Company Inc, Merck & Company Inc, Merck & Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARTON v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71002
Plaintiff:
JERRY BARTON
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Durham et al v. Merck & Company Inc
as 3:2007cv01662
Plaintiff:
McArthur Durham, McArthur Durham, Yvonne Abdul-Salaam and others
Defendant:
Merck & Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Barton et al v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv01813
Plaintiff:
Jerry Barton, Jerry Barton, Jerry Barton and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
