Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Billingsley v. Alabama Homeland Security et al

as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Jerry Donald Billingsley
Defendant:
Alabama Homeland Security, Steve Marshall and Alabama Investigations of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billingsley v. Carter et al (INMATE 4)

as 2:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
Jerry Donald Billingsley
Defendant:
Karen Carter and Easterling Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 2:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 2:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 2:2022cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billingsley v. McClain et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Jerry Donald Billingsley
Defendant:
Antonio McClain, Lt. Spence, J. Prioyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billingsley v. United States of America et al

as 2:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Jerry Donald Billingsley
Defendant:
United States of America, Baldwin, McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerry Donald Billingsley v. Warden Cook, et al
as 22-11263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY DONALD BILLINGSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, Cook, CAPTAIN GOLDEN, CO 1 SIMMON and others
Jerry Billingsley v. Warden, et al
as 21-13287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY DONALD BILLINGSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, GOLDEN and SIMMON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.