Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Stanton v. Hutchins et al
as 1:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerry James Stanton
Defendant:
Nancy Hutchins, Bambi Somerlott, Laurie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bias v. Boyd et al
as 2:2009cv01694
Petitioner:
Jerry James Bias
Respondent:
Louis Boyd and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson et al v.Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04665
Plaintiff:
Christina Jackson, Christina Jackson, Christina Jackson and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Garrett v. Norris et al
as 3:2009cv00415
Defendant:
Lisa Grief, Roger Mosley, Nobel Winnigham and others
Plaintiff:
Tracey D Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2009cv00297
Plaintiff:
Jerry James
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
JAMES v. A.C. AND S. INC. et al
as 2:2008cv89995
Plaintiff:
JERRY JAMES and JERRY JAMES
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC., A.C. AND S. INC., GARLOCK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bias v. Crosby et al
as 2:2008cv01819
Plaintiff:
Jerry James Bias
Defendant:
Chante Bias Crosby, Mike Hale, David Barber and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miley et al v. Bogalusa City
as 2:2008cv04080
Plaintiff:
Clinton A. Miley, Jr., Clay Applewhite, Dean Borel and others
Defendant:
Bogalusa City
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James v. Palmquist et al
as 2:2008cv01036
Petitioner:
Michael Jerri James
Respondent:
Palmquist and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
USA v. Michael Jame
as 08-30190
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL JERRI JAMES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
