Cases 1 - 10 of 48
United States of America v. Gutierrez Mendez
as 24-1414
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JESUS SALVADOR GUTIERREZ MENDEZ
Gonzales Gutierrez v. HS UMA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Manuel De Jesus Gonzales Gutierrez
Defendant:
HS UMA, Inc., Hongwei Zheng and Jian Xing Yang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gutierrez Solorzano v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jesus Manuel Gutierrez Solorzano
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Daniel M. Renaud and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Gutierrez Arcos et al v. Crispin's LLC et al
as 1:2023cv10933
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Gutierrez Arcos and Angel De Jesus Lopez Gutierrez
Defendant:
Crispin's LLC doing business as Sesamo, Nikita Levitan, Sabrina Shuang Gao and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gutierrez v. Rios et al
as 4:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Jesus A Gutierrez
Defendant:
Unknown Rios and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Orona-Gutierrez
as 23-40249
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Manuel De Jesus Orona-Gutierrez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Guerrero Sorto v. Garland
as 22-908
Petitioner:
YOSELYN MILIZETH GUERRERO SORTO, JESUS EDGARDO GUTIERREZ GUERRERO, KEVIN JOSE GUTIERREZ GUERRERO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv21875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
