Cases 1 - 10 of 240
Naramore et al v. City of Jasper, Alabama
as 6:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Eric Naramore, Kenneth Adam Miller, Terri Fields and others
Defendant:
City of Jasper, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Boland et al v. Hetrick
as 8:2017mc00897
Plaintiff:
James Boland , Henry Kramer , Gerard Scarano and others
Defendant:
John E. Hetrick
Boland et al v. Smith & Rogers Construction LTD
as 2:2017mc00059
Plaintiff:
James Boland , Henry Kramer , Gerald Scarano and others
Defendant:
Smith & Rogers Construction LTD
James Boland, et al v. Ace Masonry, Inc., et al
as 17-7096
Plaintiff - Appellee:
James Boland, Henry Kramer, Ken Lambert and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ace Masonry, Inc., Bella Masonry LLC, Robert P. Bellavigna, Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BOLAND et al v. HETRICK
as 1:2016cv00403
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOLAND , HENRY KRAMER , GERARD SCARANO and others
Defendant:
JOHN E HETRICK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOLAND et al v. MCCAREY MASONRY, LLC
as 1:2015cv01404
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOLAND , HENRY KRAMER , GERARD SCARANO and others
Defendant:
MCCAREY MASONRY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOLAND et al v. SMITH & ROGERS CONSTRUCTION L.T.D.
as 1:2015cv01386
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOLAND , HENRY KRAMER , GERARD SCARANO and others
Defendant:
SMITH & ROGERS CONSTRUCTION L.T.D.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOLAND et al v. CACPER CONSTRUCTION CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv01943
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOLAND , HENRY KRAMER , GERARD SCARANO and others
Defendant:
CACPER CONSTRUCTION CORP. and ADAM KULIG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Boland et al v. Bur Bros. Masonry, Inc.
as 1:2014mc00064
Plaintiff:
James Boland , Henry Kramer , Gerard Scarano and others
Defendant:
Bur Bros. Masonry, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
