Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Haley Olsen v. County of Grant, et al
as 23-35365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HALEY OLSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF GRANT, a government entity, GLENN PALMER and JIM CARPENTER
Defendant:
ABIGAIL MOBLEY
Larson v. Carpenter et al
as 6:2021cv01328
Plaintiff:
Gordon Larson
Defendant:
Grant County District Attorney Jim Carpenter and Grant County Deputy District Attorney Riccola Voigt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Carpenter et al
as 2:2021cv01328
Plaintiff:
Gordon Larson
Defendant:
Grant County District Attorney Jim Carpenter and Grant County Deputy District Attorney Riccola Voigt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olson v. Grant County et al
as 2:2020cv01342
Plaintiff:
Haley Olson
Defendant:
Jim Carpenter, Grant County and Glenn Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01976
Plaintiff:
IRVIN SAMUEL HARPER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, KELLY HARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. HARRELL et al
as 2:2017cv05603
Plaintiff:
IRVIN HARPER
Defendant:
KELLY HARRELL, LARRY KRASNER, DANIAL OMALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv14125
Plaintiff:
Lanette Carpenter and Jim Carpenter
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quade v. Reed et al
as 3:2011cv00279
Defendant:
Jim Carpenter, Brian Cutwright, Sheriff Jeff Dickerson and others
Plaintiff:
Jason C. Quade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quade v. Reed et al
as 3:2010cv01540
Defendant:
Dale Anderson, Jim Carpenter, Columbia County Council and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Charles Quade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
