Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Boyette v. Montefiore Medical Center
as 24-1279
Plaintiff:
SHEILA A. BOYETTE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and TIFFANY JIMINEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER, THE TDA PLAN COMMITTEE and others
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the Judicial Branch of Public Power, Administrative Court of Antioquia, Medellin Columbia
as 8:2024cv00167
Not Yet Classified:
Roberto Alonso Jiminez Cardona and Universidad de Antioquia
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Assistance to Foreign Tribunals
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Jiminez-Flores v. Garland
as 24-930
Petitioner:
SANDRA ELIZABETH JIMINEZ-FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gutierrez Macias v. Jiminez Inerarity
as 1:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Yunisaday Gutierrez Macias
Respondent:
Jose Fernando Jimenez Inerarity and Jose Fernando Jiminez Inerarity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Jiminez v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as ILS/3:23-CV-03678
Plaintiff:
Jiminez
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
USA v. Vasquez
as 23-11130
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rafael Jiminez Vasquez, also known as Rafael Jemeres Vasquez, also known as Lauro Beltran-Lugo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Major
as 23-6187
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PAUL FOSTER, CHARLIE JIMINEZ, TORREL SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CRAIG MAJOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
