Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Thurman et al v. NewRez, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Thurman and Jimmy Lee Davis
Defendant:
NewRez, LLC and PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Davis v. Catchings et al
as 3:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Defendant:
Tawana Catchings, Burl Cain and Donald Jackson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. FBI et al
as 3:2022cv09066
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Defendant:
FBI and London Breed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. McCleave et al
as 3:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Defendant:
Charmaine McCleave, Latrease Funches and M. Brewer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Huffman et al
as 1:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Defendant:
Brand Huffman and Property Dept. of S.M.C.I.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Matthews et al
as 3:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Defendant:
Raniece Matthews and Superintendent Marcus McClure
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Patrick et al
as 3:2021cv00556
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Defendant:
Stephanie Patrick, Sandra William, Hector Portillio and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Davis v. Andrew Saul, et al
as 21-15338
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED and ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY LEE DAVIS
Davis v. Saul
as 3:2020cv05805
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Davis v. Arbuthnot
as 3:2020cv00140
Respondent:
Teresa Arbuthnot
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
