Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jimmy Moore v. William Charles, et al
as 17-40252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM CHARLES, D. ROHOE, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, RODGER A. MCDONALD, Assistant Warden and others
Moore v. Williams et al
as 4:2014cv00825
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Moore
Defendant:
Charles Williams, D. Rohoe, Rodger A. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv06757
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Moore v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-10546
Petitioner - Appellant:
JIMMY MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Dotson v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2013cv02766
Plaintiff:
Andre Lovell Dotson
Defendant:
Shelby County Government , William Oldham and Robert Moore
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Chavis v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 13-1556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Moore v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv00883
Petitioner:
Jimmy Moore
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Director TDCJ
as 4:2013cv00064
Petitioner:
Jimmy Moore
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv05642
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. City of Phila, et al
as 11-4233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CLERK OF COURT FOR CITY OF PHILA, COLEMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
