Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Joseph Thompson v. Wanda Laramore, et al
as 21-1029
Defendant / Appellee:
Ronald J. Proctor, Dr., Narendrasinh Khengar, Dr., Cyndee Howell, Nurse Practitioner and others
Defendant:
Don Ruzicka, MO DOC Board Member, Stanley Keely, Assistant Warden, Chuck Pryor, MO DOC Board Member and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Leroy Thompson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Joseph Thompson v. Wanda Laramore, et al
as 20-1176
Defendant / Appellee:
Ronald J. Proctor, Dr., Narendrasinh Khengar, Dr., Cyndee Howell, Nurse Practitioner and others
Defendant:
Don Ruzicka, MO DOC Board Member, Stanley Keely, Assistant Warden, Chuck Pryor, MO DOC Board Member and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Leroy Thompson
Jimmy Wells v. Warden, et al
as 17-10930
Petitioner - Appellant:
JIMMY WELLS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Thompson v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2015cv04303
Plaintiff:
Joseph Leroy Thompson
Defendant:
George A. Lombardi, Stanley Keely, Jay Cassady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2014cv01222
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Wells
Defendant:
Karla Jones and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
WELLS v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv79545
Plaintiff:
JIMMY WELLS
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GULF BELTING & GASKET CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Molson v. Nationwide Insurance Company
as 4:2007cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jeff Molson
Defendant:
Nationwide Insurance Company, Stephen C Cox, Craig Tumlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
