Cases 1 - 10 of 279
GRAHAM v. BIDEN et al
as 5:2024cv00426
Petitioner:
Jonathan Graham
Respondent:
Joe Biden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Darrel Fisher v. United States, et al
as 24-1870
Plaintiff:
Darrel R. Fisher
Defendant:
United States of America and Joe Biden
Cowan v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
Felix Lyle Cowan
Defendant:
Joe Biden and Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Pritzer et al
as 1:2024cv01142
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
J B Pritzer, U.S. and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
George Wyatt, Jr
Defendant:
Joe Biden, O L Luther and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goss v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 4:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Jamie Goss
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, China Wuhan Government, United State Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Fisher v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Defendant:
United States of America and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morgan v. Biden
as 1:2024cv00205
Petitioner:
C. Wayne Morgan, Charles Wayne Morgan and C. Wayn Morgan
Respondent:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nobile v. FBI Administration of Joe Biden
as 1:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
Natacha Nobile
Defendant:
FBI Administration of Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
