Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Adelson v. Oakland, County of et al
as 2:2023cv11291
Plaintiff:
Wendy Adelson and Wendy B. Adelson [E-FILER]
Defendant:
County of Oakland, Doe John, John #1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. Detroit, City of, et al
as 2:2023cv10217
Plaintiff:
Clifton Smith
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, John 1 Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fincher v. City of Newburgh et al
as 7:2022cv10590
Plaintiff:
Twanda Fincher and Tyrell Fincher
Defendant:
City of Newburgh, John 1 Doe, Doe 2 John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bravo v. Garland
as 1:2022cv06736
Plaintiff:
Luis Bravo
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, John 1 Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lech v. Gettel et al
as 2:2022cv11197
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lech
Defendant:
Gina Gettel, Perry Curtis, W Mark Fondren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gelhaye v. Arradondo et al
as 0:2021cv01585
Plaintiff:
Ana Maria Gelhaye
Defendant:
Medaria Arradondo, John 1 Doe, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mendoza v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2021cv01503
Plaintiff:
Maria Mendoza
Defendant:
City of Portland by and through Portland Police Bureau, Portland Police Offc John 1 Doe, Portland Police Offc John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bunch v. Clay County Sheriff et al
as 4:2021cv00580
Plaintiff:
Royrico A Bunch
Defendant:
Clay County Sheriff, John Doe, John #2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brooks v. Doe et al
as 0:2021cv01642
Plaintiff:
Darius Hakeem Brooks
Defendant:
John 1 Doe, John Does 2-6, John Does 7 and 8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
