Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Cokley v. Dixon et al
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Cokley
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Snider, Captain Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Thornton et al
as 1:2023cv02036
Plaintiff:
Adam Titus
Defendant:
Thornton, John/Jane Doe, Warden Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Corizon, LLC, et al
as 5:2023cv06005
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC,, Corizon, Inc., Corizon, Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeri Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Roberts v. Lozada
as 22-11175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reno Preston Roberts
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrea Lozada, Warden I, TDCJ-Institutional Division, David Reed, Jr., Assistant Warden, TDCJ-Institutional Division, Ricardo Ramirez, Major of Corrections Officer, TDCJ-Institutional Divison and others
Rosa v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rosa
Defendant:
Rollin Cook, William Mulligan, Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zombie v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv01338
Plaintiff:
Zera Lola Zombie
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Josh Highberger, Brandon Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClure v. Paxton et al
as 5:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Michael Miller, Jennifer Tharp, John #4 Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Troy McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Dorsey v. Sandy McCain, et al
as 18-30926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DORSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDY MCCAIN, CASEY MCVEA, JOHN #1 DOE, A-Team Guard and others
Rosetto v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv02292
Plaintiff:
Perry James Rosetto
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Randy Pfister, Salem Obaisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maples v. Doe et al
as 1:2018cv00513
Plaintiff:
Ryan Maples
Defendant:
John (1) Doe, John (2) Doe and John (3) Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
