Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gamble v. Barkley et al
as 5:2018cv00863
Plaintiff:
Ajaron Gamble
Defendant:
John Barkley, David Dunlap, Lisa Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Byars et al
as 8:2016cv03811
Plaintiff:
Timothy A Evans
Defendant:
William R Byars, Jr, Dennis Patterson, John R Pate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stepanovich et al v. City of Naples, Florida et al
as 2:2014cv00270
Plaintiff:
Aleksandar Stepanovich , Monika Mozolicova and Milan Uzunovic
Defendant:
City of Naples, Florida, Kyle Bradshaw, Ryan Harp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaun Chappell v. John Barkley et al
as 2:2014cv00130
Defendant:
John Barkley, Kenneth Curtis and Christopher Phelan
Plaintiff:
Shaun Chappell
Anthony Mann v. C Failey
as 13-6446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. MANN
Defendant - Appellee:
LT C FAILEY, MAJOR SHARONDA SUTTON, WARDEN ROBERT STEVENSON and others
Defendant:
OFFICER MURRAY
Shaun Booker-T Chappell v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2013cv00986
Defendant:
Sergeant John Barkley, City of Los Angeles, Officer Kenneth Curtis and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Booker-T Chappell
Fred Flores, Jr. v. Robert Stevenson, III
as 12-7262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED FLORES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III, Warden, SHAONDA SUTTON, Major, JOHN BARKLEY, Associate Warden Programs and others
Mann v. Failey et al
as 0:2011cv02232
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Mann
Defendant:
C Failey, Sheronda Sutton, Robert Stevenson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Flores v. Stevenson et al
as 2:2011cv01278
Plaintiff:
Fred Flores, Jr
Defendant:
Robert M Stevenson, III, Sharonda Sutton, John Barkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
