Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Beamon v. Cummins et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00608
Plaintiff:
James Beamon
Defendant:
John Cummins, Troy King and Montgomery County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams et al v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02234
Plaintiff:
Martha Ann Adams, Martha Ann Adams, Becky Allerheiligen and others
Defendant:
Morgan Asset Management, Inc., Regions Financial Corporation, MK Holding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Glover v. Cummins et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00262
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Glover
Defendant:
John Cummins, Correctional Medical Services and Nurse Parks
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alverson v. Cummins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00081
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Defendant:
John Cummins, Louis Boyd, Bob Riley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mccoy v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
Rico R. Mccoy
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections, Richard F. Allen, John Cummins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dobbins v. Cummins (INMATE 1)
as 2:2008cv00997
Plaintiff:
William Geoffery Dobbins
Defendant:
John Cummins
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dobbins v. Cummins et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00996
Plaintiff:
William Geoffery Dobbins
Defendant:
John Cummins, Doctor Robbins and CMS (Correctional Medical Services)
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dedeaux v. Cummins et al
as 1:2008cv00599
Petitioner:
Thomas Lee Dedeaux
Respondent:
Troy King and John Cummins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Cummins et al
as 2:2008cv01706
Petitioner:
Leander Calhoun
Respondent:
John Cummins and Attorney General of the State of ALabama
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
