Cases 1 - 10 of 14,458
HASELRIG v. LAURICIA et al
as 2:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
CORTEZ HASELRIG
Defendant:
JOSEPH LAURICIA, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Lucero, et al
as 24-2035
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON WHITE
Defendant:
ALISHA TAFOYA LUCERO, New Mexico Corrections Department, in her individual capacity, JOE LYTLE, New Mexico Corrections Department, in his individual capacity, MELISSA ORTIZ, New Mexico Corrections Department, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe #1 (JRC) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (JRC), John Doe #2 (TJC), John Doe #3 (RKF) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds v. Minter et al
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Terry Darnell Reynolds
Defendant:
Roy Mintor, Savannah Chatham Metro Police Department, Vincent Pelligrini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Cook v. David Boss, et al
as 24-3350
Plaintiff:
JOHN COOK
Defendant:
DAVID BOSS, KELLY VASAS, JONATHON ROMANIN and others
Dowlen v. The City of Springfield, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kierra Lachelle Dowlen
Defendant:
The City of Springfield, Tennessee and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anesha Parker v. Roseberte Clervil, et al
as 24-11293
Plaintiff:
ANESHA PARKER
Defendant:
ROSEBERTE CLERVIL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Lykens v. Peters et al
as 4:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Scott Lykens
Defendant:
Colete S. Peters, James Petrucci, Stephen Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
