Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Smith v. Pettis County et al
as 2:2022cv04165
Plaintiff:
Donna Smith
Defendant:
Pettis County, Brad Anders, Sam Hargrave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Laliberte v. Doe 1 et al
as 0:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
David Laliberte
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Does 2-6, John Does 7 and 8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Doe et al
as 0:2021cv01642
Plaintiff:
Darius Hakeem Brooks
Defendant:
John 1 Doe, John Does 2-6, John Does 7 and 8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gelhaye v. Arradondo et al
as 0:2021cv01585
Plaintiff:
Ana Maria Gelhaye
Defendant:
Medaria Arradondo, John 1 Doe, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cunningham v. Cooper County, Missouri et al
as 2:2019cv04086
Defendant:
Cooper County, Missouri, John Doe 7, John Doe 8 and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Severance v. Dr. Charles Chastain, et al
as 19-1145
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Seargeon Payaillia, John Doe 8 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Larry Keithley, Individual Capacity, Joyce Chamberlin, Individual Capacity, Dr. Ernest Jackson, Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David A. Severance
Dewalt v. Brauner et al
as 4:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Adam Randazzo, John Doe #5, Unknown Eckhoff and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Dewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2018cv05111
Defendant:
John Doe 7, John Doe 6, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
James Albert Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Esposito v. Nixon et al
as 2:2015cv04073
Plaintiff:
Vincent J Esposito
Defendant:
Jay Nixon, George Lombardi, Jason Kander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
